Mazda CX-3 2018 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 148 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-3 engine produces 2 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Mazda CX-5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.3 | |
|
The Mazda CX-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-3 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda CX-5 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from five 4x4 versions of Mazda CX-5 2015 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is smaller. Mazda CX-3 is 28 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 403 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Mazda CX-3 has 163 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 360 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Mazda CX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`762 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 150 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |