Mazda CX-3 2018 vs Audi Q2 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 148 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-3 engine produces 42 HP less power than Audi Q2, whereas torque is 125 NM less than Audi Q2. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 50 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 147 mm (5.8 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-3 is 8 cm longer than the Audi Q2, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 1050 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-3 has 165 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q2. This could mean that the Mazda CX-3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-3 (by 210 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Audi Q2, which means Mazda CX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`762 | 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Audi Q2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-3 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Audi Q2, so Audi Q2 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Audi Q2 has
| |