Mazda CX-3 2018 vs Peugeot 2008 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mazda CX-3) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Peugeot 2008) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 207 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-3 engine produces 48 HP more power than Peugeot 2008, but torque is 43 NM less than Peugeot 2008. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 3.6 | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-3 consumes 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-3 could require 510 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 44 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Mazda CX-3 has 4x4: AWD system provides 98% of power to the front under normal conditions and can shift up to 50% of torque to the rear if wheels slip. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 400'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Citroen Berlingo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.53 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-3 is 3 cm shorter than the Peugeot 2008, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 434 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 1467 litres | |
|
Peugeot 2008 has more luggage space. Mazda CX-3 has 84 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 2008 (by 207 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`773 | 1`731 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |