Mazda CX-3 2018 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 207 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-3 engine produces 30 HP less power than Mazda CX-30, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Mazda CX-30. Despite less power, Mazda CX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 4.9 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-3 consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-3 could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 44 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-30 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-3 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5 | Used also on Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda CX-3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is smaller. Mazda CX-3 is 12 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-30, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 1406 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-30 has more luggage space. Mazda CX-3 has 80 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 146 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-30, which means Mazda CX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`773 | 2`042 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |