Mazda CX-3 2015 vs Opel Mokka 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Opel Mokka is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-3 engine produces 25 HP less power than Opel Mokka, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Opel Mokka. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 5.1 | |
|
The Mazda CX-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-3 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is smaller. Mazda CX-3 and Opel Mokka are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 1372 litres | |
| Mazda CX-3 has 6 litres less trunk space than the Opel Mokka. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 112 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`735 | 1`959 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Opel Mokka scores higher in safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Mokka has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |