Mazda CX-3 2015 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving. Mazda CX-3 engine produces 9 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Mazda CX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda CX-3 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-3 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-3 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 44 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is smaller. Mazda CX-3 is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1260 litres | 1219 litres | |
| Mazda CX-3 has 69 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-3 (by 41 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`815 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi ASX has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |