Mazda CX-3 2015 vs Honda HR-V 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 204 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda CX-3 engine produces 20 HP less power than Honda HR-V, but torque is 32 NM more than Honda HR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 8.1 | |
|
The Mazda CX-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-3 consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 660 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Honda HR-V can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is smaller. Mazda CX-3 is 2 cm shorter than the Honda HR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 431 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 1456 litres | |
|
Honda HR-V has more luggage space. Mazda CX-3 has 81 litres less trunk space than the Honda HR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda HR-V (by 196 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda HR-V, which means Mazda CX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Honda HR-V scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Honda HR-V has
| |