Mazda CX-3 2014 vs Opel Mokka 2012

 
Mazda CX-3
2014 - 2018
Opel Mokka
2012 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.7 Diesel
Petrol engines (Mazda CX-3) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Opel Mokka) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences.

Performance

Power: 150 HP130 HP
Torque: 210 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds9.4 seconds
Mazda CX-3 engine produces 20 HP more power than Opel Mokka, but torque is 90 NM less than Opel Mokka.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data5.1
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)158 mm (6.2 inches)
Mazda CX-3 2014 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ...  More about Mazda CX-3 2014 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.28 m
Width: 1.77 m1.78 m
Height: 1.55 m1.66 m
Mazda CX-3 is smaller.
Mazda CX-3 and Opel Mokka are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 350 litres356 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1260 litres1372 litres
Mazda CX-3 has 6 litres less trunk space than the Opel Mokka. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 112 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`959
Safety:
Opel Mokka scores higher in safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
high

high
Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Mokka has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 11 6008200
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-3 has
  • more power
  • fewer faults
Opel Mokka has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv