Mazda CX-3 2014 vs Opel Mokka 2012

 
Mazda CX-3
2014 - 2018
Opel Mokka
2012 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.7 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP130 HP
Torque: 210 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds9.4 seconds
Mazda CX-3 engine produces 20 HP more power than Opel Mokka, but torque is 90 NM less than Opel Mokka.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data5.1

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)158 mm (6.2 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.28 m
Width: 1.77 m1.78 m
Height: 1.55 m1.66 m
Mazda CX-3 is smaller.
Mazda CX-3 and Opel Mokka are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 350 litres356 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1260 litres1372 litres
Mazda CX-3 has 6 litres less trunk space than the Opel Mokka. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 112 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`959
Safety:
Opel Mokka scores higher in safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
high

high
Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Mokka has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 14 0009600
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-3 has
  • more power
  • fewer faults
Opel Mokka has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv