Mazda CX-3 2014 vs Opel Mokka 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-3 engine produces 35 HP more power than Opel Mokka, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Opel Mokka. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.5 | |
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5 | Used also on Opel Astra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mazda CX-3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Mazda CX-3 2014 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-3 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is smaller. Mazda CX-3 and Opel Mokka are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 1372 litres | |
| Mazda CX-3 has 6 litres less trunk space than the Opel Mokka. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 112 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`959 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Opel Mokka scores higher in safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Mokka has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |