Mazda CX-3 2014 vs Opel Mokka 2016

 
Mazda CX-3
2014 - 2018
Opel Mokka
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP110 HP
Torque: 210 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds12.2 seconds
Mazda CX-3 engine produces 40 HP more power than Opel Mokka, but torque is 90 NM less than Opel Mokka.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no datano data
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)158 mm (6.2 inches)
Mazda CX-3 2014 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ...  More about Mazda CX-3 2014 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.28 m
Width: 1.77 m1.78 m
Height: 1.55 m1.66 m
Mazda CX-3 and Opel Mokka are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 350 litres356 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1260 litres1372 litres
Mazda CX-3 has 6 litres less trunk space than the Opel Mokka. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 112 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka, which means Mazda CX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`883
Safety:
Mazda CX-3 scores higher in safety tests, but Opel Mokka is better rated in child safety tests.
Quality:
high

high
Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Mokka has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 12 40011 000
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-3 has
  • more power
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Opel Mokka has
  • higher children safety
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv