Mazda CX-3 2014 vs Volkswagen T-Roc 2020

 
Mazda CX-3
2014 - 2018
Volkswagen T-Roc
2020 - 2021
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 210 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds8.6 seconds
Mazda CX-3 and Volkswagen T-Roc have the same engine power, but Mazda CX-3 torque is 40 NM less than Volkswagen T-Roc.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no datano data
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Mazda CX-3 2014 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ...  More about Mazda CX-3 2014 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.23 m
Width: 1.77 m1.82 m
Height: 1.55 m1.57 m
Mazda CX-3 is 4 cm longer than the Volkswagen T-Roc, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 350 litres445 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1260 litres1290 litres
Volkswagen T-Roc has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-3 has 95 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen T-Roc. This could mean that the Mazda CX-3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen T-Roc (by 30 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen T-Roc, which means Mazda CX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`870
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

high
Average price (€): 11 20018 200
Pros and Cons: Mazda CX-3 has
  • lower price
Volkswagen T-Roc has
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv