Mazda CX-3 2014 vs Volkswagen T-Roc 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-3 engine produces 35 HP more power than Volkswagen T-Roc, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Volkswagen T-Roc. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.1 | |
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 161 mm (6.3 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.57 m | |
| Mazda CX-3 is 4 cm longer than the Volkswagen T-Roc, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 1290 litres | |
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-3 has 95 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen T-Roc. This could mean that the Mazda CX-3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen T-Roc (by 30 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen T-Roc, which means Mazda CX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`780 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Volkswagen T-Roc has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-3 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volkswagen T-Roc, so Volkswagen T-Roc quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 20 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Volkswagen T-Roc has
| |