Mazda CX-3 2014 vs Skoda Yeti 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-3 engine produces 28 HP more power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Skoda Yeti. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.8 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5 | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Mazda CX-3 2014 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-3 2014 2.0 engine Skoda Yeti 2013 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.69 m | |
| Mazda CX-3 is 5 cm longer than the Skoda Yeti, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Yeti has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-3 has 55 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Yeti. This could mean that the Mazda CX-3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Yeti has serious deffects in 125 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 800 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |