Mazda CX-3 2014 vs Skoda Yeti 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-3 engine produces 28 HP more power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Skoda Yeti. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.8 | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5 | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.69 m | |
| Mazda CX-3 is 5 cm longer than the Skoda Yeti, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Yeti has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-3 has 55 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Yeti. This could mean that the Mazda CX-3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Yeti has serious deffects in 125 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |