Mazda CX-3 2014 vs Skoda Kamiq 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda CX-3 engine produces 35 HP more power than Skoda Kamiq, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Skoda Kamiq. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Mazda CX-3 2014 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-3 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.53 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-3 is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Kamiq, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Kamiq has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-3 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Kamiq. This could mean that the Mazda CX-3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Kamiq scores higher in safety tests. The Skoda Kamiq scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 19 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Skoda Kamiq has
| |