Mazda CX-3 2014 vs Seat Ateca 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-3 and Seat Ateca have the same engine power, but Mazda CX-3 torque is 130 NM less than Seat Ateca. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.4 | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is smaller. Mazda CX-3 is 6 cm shorter than the Seat Ateca, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage space. Mazda CX-3 has 160 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Seat Ateca is better rated in child safety tests. The Mazda CX-3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ateca has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 21 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Seat Ateca has
| |