Mazda CX-3 2014 vs Seat Ateca 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mazda CX-3) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Seat Ateca) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-3 and Seat Ateca have the same engine power, but Mazda CX-3 torque is 130 NM less than Seat Ateca. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.4 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mazda CX-3 2014 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-3 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is smaller. Mazda CX-3 is 6 cm shorter than the Seat Ateca, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage space. Mazda CX-3 has 160 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Seat Ateca is better rated in child safety tests. The Mazda CX-3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ateca has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 800 | 19 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Seat Ateca has
| |