Mazda CX-3 2014 vs Jeep Renegade 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-3 engine produces 20 HP less power than Jeep Renegade, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Jeep Renegade. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.9 | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Jeep Renegade 2014: The car is equipped with Active Drive I/LOW, a full-time 4x4 system that requires no driver input. Under normal conditions, this system sends all available torque to the front wheels. If the system detects that the front wheels are moving faster than the rear wheels, it will send power through the power transfer unit to the rear axle to maintain the same wheelspeed. Active Drive Low adds a low-range gear in 4WD Low mode for situations requiring low speeds, such as crawling across big rocks or towing a marine trailer out of the water. The Active Drive Low system provides a 20:1 crawl ratio with significantly controlled throttle response. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 198 mm (7.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Renegade can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Mazda CX-3 2014 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-3 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.70 m | |
| Mazda CX-3 is 2 cm longer than the Jeep Renegade, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 351 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 1297 litres | |
| Mazda CX-3 has 1 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Renegade. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Renegade (by 37 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Jeep Renegade, which means Mazda CX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jeep Renegade is better rated in child safety tests. The Jeep Renegade scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 14 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Jeep Renegade has
| |