Mazda CX-3 2014 vs Honda HR-V 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 210 NM | 172 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
Mazda CX-3 engine produces 10 HP more power than Honda HR-V, whereas torque is 38 NM more than Honda HR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.1 | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Honda HR-V can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.28 m | 4.30 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.55 m | 1.61 m | |
Mazda CX-3 is smaller. Mazda CX-3 is 2 cm shorter than the Honda HR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 431 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 1456 litres | |
Honda HR-V has more luggage space. Mazda CX-3 has 81 litres less trunk space than the Honda HR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda HR-V (by 196 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda HR-V, which means Mazda CX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
Safety: | |||
The Honda HR-V scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | high | no data | |
Average price (€): | 14 000 | 16 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Honda HR-V has
| |