Mazda CX-3 2014 vs Opel Mokka 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-3 engine produces 35 HP more power than Opel Mokka, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Opel Mokka. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda CX-3 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-3 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 44 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Mokka gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5 | Used also on Opel Astra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mazda CX-3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.66 m | |
| Mazda CX-3 and Opel Mokka are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 1372 litres | |
| Mazda CX-3 has 6 litres less trunk space than the Opel Mokka. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 112 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka, which means Mazda CX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`764 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda CX-3 scores higher in safety tests, but Opel Mokka is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Mokka has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |