Mazda CX-3 2014 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-3 and Mazda CX-5 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mazda CX-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.2 | |
| Mazda CX-3 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda CX-3 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 44 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Mazda CX-3 has 4x4: AWD system delivers 98 percent of power to the front wheels under normal conditions, and up to 50 percent of torque can be shifted to the rear wheels in the event of wheel slip. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 14 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is smaller. Mazda CX-3 is 27 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 463 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1260 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Mazda CX-3 has 113 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 360 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Mazda CX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`860 kg | 1`945 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`235 kg | 1`411 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 625 kg | 534 kg | |
| Mazda CX-3 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem more than Mazda CX-5. Therefore, Mazda CX-3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda CX-5 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda CX-5 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 250 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |