Mazda CX-3 2014 vs Honda HR-V 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda CX-3 engine produces 9 HP more power than Honda HR-V, whereas torque is 38 NM more than Honda HR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 8.4 | |
|
The Mazda CX-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda CX-3 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 44 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Honda HR-V can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Honda HR-V version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Mazda CX-3 2014 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-3 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is smaller. Mazda CX-3 is 2 cm shorter than the Honda HR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 431 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 1456 litres | |
|
Honda HR-V has more luggage space. Mazda CX-3 has 81 litres less trunk space than the Honda HR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda HR-V (by 196 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda HR-V, which means Mazda CX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Honda HR-V scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Honda HR-V has
| |