Mazda CX-3 2018 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 150 HP | 117 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 - 270 NM | 154 - 197 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 11 seconds | 10.2 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 7.0 | 6.1 - 7.7 | |
|
Mazda CX-3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi ASX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is smaller. Mazda CX-3 is 9 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 406 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 1206 litres | |
| Mazda CX-3 has 56 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-3 (by 54 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`765 | ~ 1`945 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |