Mazda CX-3 2018 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 150 HP | 116 - 189 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 - 270 NM | 213 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 11 seconds | 8.3 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 7.0 | 4.4 - 6.4 | |
|
Mazda CX-3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-30. On average, a Mazda CX-3 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Mazda CX-30. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 175 - 180 mm (6.9 - 7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-30 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is smaller. Mazda CX-3 is 12 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-30, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 1406 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-30 has more luggage space. Mazda CX-3 has 80 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 146 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-30, which means Mazda CX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`765 | ~ 1`986 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |