Mazda CX-3 2018 vs Audi Q2 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.0 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 - 150 HP | 116 - 190 HP | |
Torque: | 195 - 270 NM | 200 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 11 seconds | 6.5 - 10.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 7.0 | 4.4 - 5.4 | |
Mazda CX-3 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi Q2. On average, Mazda CX-3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 147 mm (5.8 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.28 m | 4.19 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.54 m | 1.51 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-3 is 8 cm longer than the Audi Q2, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 405 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 1050 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Mazda CX-3 has 55 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q2. This could mean that the Mazda CX-3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-3 (by 210 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Audi Q2, which means Mazda CX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`765 | ~ 1`920 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | high | |
Average price (€): | 17 000 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Audi Q2 has
| |