Mazda CX-3 2014 vs Honda HR-V 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 150 HP | 120 - 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 204 - 270 NM | 155 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 11.9 seconds | 10.1 - 10.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 - 6.4 | 4.0 - 8.4 | |
|
Mazda CX-3 petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda HR-V. On average, Mazda CX-3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Honda HR-V can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Mazda CX-3 is smaller. Mazda CX-3 is 2 cm shorter than the Honda HR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-3 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 431 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1260 litres | 1456 litres | |
|
Honda HR-V has more luggage space. Mazda CX-3 has 81 litres less trunk space than the Honda HR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda HR-V (by 196 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-3 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda HR-V, which means Mazda CX-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`814 | ~ 1`830 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Honda HR-V scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-3 has
|
Honda HR-V has
| |