Mazda BT-50 2020 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2022
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 205 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Mazda BT-50 engine produces 55 HP less power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Volkswagen Amarok. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 9.1 | |
|
The Mazda BT-50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda BT-50 consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that by driving the Mazda BT-50 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda BT-50 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.28 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.88 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda BT-50 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Amarok, which means Mazda BT-50 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`000 kg | 3`230 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`779 kg | 2`189 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`221 kg | 1`041 kg | |
| Mazda BT-50 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem more than Volkswagen Amarok. Therefore, Mazda BT-50 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 49 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda BT-50 has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |