Mazda BT-50 2020 vs Ford Ranger 2023
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 405 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
| Mazda BT-50 engine produces 20 HP less power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 8.5 | |
|
The Mazda BT-50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda BT-50 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Mazda BT-50 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 235 mm (9.3 inches) | 261 mm (10.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.28 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | no data | 2.02 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.88 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda BT-50 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Mazda BT-50 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`000 kg | 3`190 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`779 kg | 2`314 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`221 kg | 876 kg | |
| Mazda BT-50 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 28 procentiem more than Ford Ranger. Therefore, Mazda BT-50 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 38 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda BT-50 has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |