Mazda BT-50 2020 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2022
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 209 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda BT-50 engine produces 59 HP less power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Volkswagen Amarok. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 8.3 | |
|
The Mazda BT-50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda BT-50 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that by driving the Mazda BT-50 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda BT-50 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 235 mm (9.3 inches) | 217 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda BT-50 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda BT-50 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Mazda BT-50 2020 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.28 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.88 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | no data | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`000 kg | 3`280 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`815 kg | 2`335 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`185 kg | 945 kg | |
| Mazda BT-50 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem more than Volkswagen Amarok. Therefore, Mazda BT-50 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 49 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda BT-50 has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |