Mazda BT-50 2020 vs Ford Ranger 2023
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
| Mazda BT-50 engine produces 50 HP less power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Ford Ranger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 10.2 | |
|
The Mazda BT-50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda BT-50 consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Mazda BT-50 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 240 mm (9.4 inches) | 261 mm (10.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.28 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.88 m | |
|
Mazda BT-50 is smaller. Mazda BT-50 is 8 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda BT-50 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda BT-50 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Mazda BT-50 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`100 kg | 3`300 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`010 kg | 2`486 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`090 kg | 814 kg | |
| Mazda BT-50 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 25 procentiem more than Ford Ranger. Therefore, Mazda BT-50 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 42 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda BT-50 has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |