Mazda BT-50
2018 - 2020
XTR 3.2 Automatic | 200 HP | Diesel | Automatic
XTR 3.2 Automatic 4x4 | 200 HP | Diesel | Automatic | 4x4
XTR 3.2 4x4 | 200 HP | Diesel | Manual | 4x4
XTR 3.2 | 200 HP | Diesel | Manual
3.2 Automatic | 200 HP | Diesel | Automatic
3.2 Automatic 4x4 | 200 HP | Diesel | Automatic | 4x4
3.2 4x4 | 200 HP | Diesel | Manual | 4x4
3.2 | 200 HP | Diesel | Manual
Ford Ranger
2019 - 2022
Raptor 2.0 EcoBlue | 213 HP | Diesel | Automatic | 4x4
3.2 Duratorq TDCi | 200 HP | Diesel | Automatic | 4x4
3.2 Duratorq TDCi | 200 HP | Diesel | Manual | 4x4
2.0 EcoBlue | 213 HP | Diesel | Automatic | 4x4
2.0 EcoBlue | 213 HP | Diesel | Manual | 4x4
2.0 EcoBlue | 170 HP | Diesel | Automatic | 4x4
2.0 EcoBlue | 170 HP | Diesel | Manual | 4x4
Gearbox:
Manual Manual
Engine:
3.2 Diesel 3.2 Diesel
Performance
Power:
200 HP 200 HP
Torque:
470 NM 470 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:
n/a seconds 10.9 seconds
Mazda BT-50 and Ford Ranger have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):
8.9 8.9
Fuel tank capacity:
80 litres 80 litres
Full fuel tank distance:
890 km in combined cycle 890 km in combined cycle
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption " to learn more about fuel economy.
Drive type
Wheel drive type:
Rear wheel drive (RWD) All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance:
232 mm (9.1 inches) 237 mm (9.3 inches)
Dimensions
Length:
5.37 m 5.36 m
Width:
1.85 m 1.87 m
Height:
1.82 m 1.87 m
Mazda BT-50 and Ford Ranger are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity:
no data no data
Turning diameter:
12.4 meters 12.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda BT-50 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger.
Gross weight:
3`200 kg 3`270 kg
Net weight: 1`988 kg 2`246 kg Load capacity: 1`212 kg 1`024 kg Mazda BT-50 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem more than Ford Ranger. Therefore, Mazda BT-50 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety:
no data no data
Quality:
no data no data
Average price (€):
no data 25 600
Pros and Cons:
Mazda BT-50 has
higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Ford Ranger has
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
