Mazda BT-50 2015 vs Nissan Navara 2005

 
Mazda BT-50
2015 - 2018
Nissan Navara
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP174 HP
Torque: 375 NM403 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds11.4 seconds
Mazda BT-50 engine produces 24 HP less power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Nissan Navara.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.48.5
Mazda BT-50 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that by driving the Mazda BT-50 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 950 km in combined cycle940 km in combined cycle

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 5.37 m5.22 m
Width: 1.85 m1.85 m
Height: 1.82 m1.78 m
Mazda BT-50 is 15 cm longer than the Nissan Navara, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda BT-50 is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 12.4 meters13.3 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda BT-50 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Nissan Navara, which means Mazda BT-50 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data3`000
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data6000
Pros and Cons: Mazda BT-50 has
  • better manoeuvrability
Nissan Navara has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv