Mazda BT-50 2015 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 375 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 15 seconds | |
| Mazda BT-50 engine produces 14 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 61 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 8.3 | |
| Mazda BT-50 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda BT-50 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda BT-50 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.37 m | 5.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Mazda BT-50 is larger. Mazda BT-50 is 19 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 10 cm wider, while the height of Mazda BT-50 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda BT-50 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200, which means Mazda BT-50 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`850 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda BT-50 has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |