Mazda BT-50 2015 vs Isuzu D-Max 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 375 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13 seconds | |
| Mazda BT-50 engine produces 13 HP less power than Isuzu D-Max, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Isuzu D-Max. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.3 | |
|
The Isuzu D-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda BT-50 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda BT-50 could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.37 m | 5.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
| Mazda BT-50 is 8 cm longer than the Isuzu D-Max, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda BT-50 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda BT-50 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Isuzu D-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Isuzu D-Max has
| |