Mazda BT-50 2015 vs Ford Ranger 2012

	Mazda BT-50 2015 - 2018	Ford Ranger 2012 - 2015
Gearbox:	Manual	Manual
Engine:	2.2 Diesel	2.2 Diesel
Performance
Power:	150 HP	150 HP
Torque:	375 NM	375 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	n/a seconds	12.3 seconds
	Mazda BT-50 and Ford Ranger have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	8.4	8.5
	Mazda BT-50 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that by driving the Mazda BT-50 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity:	80 litres	80 litres
Full fuel tank distance:	950 km in combined cycle	940 km in combined cycle
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type
Wheel drive type:	Rear wheel drive (RWD)	All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Dimensions
Length:	5.37 m	5.36 m
Width:	1.85 m	1.85 m
Height:	1.82 m	1.82 m
	Both cars are similar in size. Mazda BT-50 is 1 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity:	no data	1210 litres
Turning diameter:	12.4 meters	12.7 meters
	The turning circle of the Mazda BT-50 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger.
Gross weight (kg):	no data	1`144

Safety:	no data
Quality:	no data	no data
Average price (€):	no data	19 400
Pros and Cons:		Ford Ranger has has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Performance