Mazda BT-50 2006 vs Toyota Hilux 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
| Mazda BT-50 engine produces 1 HP less power than Toyota Hilux, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Toyota Hilux. Despite less power, Mazda BT-50 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 7.3 | |
|
The Toyota Hilux is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda BT-50 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda BT-50 could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Hilux gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.86 m | |
| Mazda BT-50 is 19 cm shorter than the Toyota Hilux, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda BT-50 is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 900 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 13.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda BT-50 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Toyota Hilux, which means Mazda BT-50 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`030 | 2`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda BT-50 has
|
Toyota Hilux has
| |