Mazda BT-50 2006 vs Mazda BT-50 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 375 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda BT-50 2006 engine produces 7 HP less power than Mazda BT-50 2015, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Mazda BT-50 2015. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 8.4 | |
|
The Mazda BT-50 2015 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda BT-50 2006 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda BT-50 2015, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda BT-50 2006 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda BT-50 2015 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Mazda BT-50 2006 is smaller. Mazda BT-50 2006 is 30 cm shorter than the Mazda BT-50 2015, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda BT-50 2006 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda BT-50 2006 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda BT-50 2015. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`030 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda BT-50 has
|
Mazda BT-50 has
| |