Mazda BT-50 2006 vs Isuzu D-Max 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mazda BT-50 engine produces 7 HP more power than Isuzu D-Max, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Isuzu D-Max. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 8.1 | |
|
The Isuzu D-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda BT-50 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda BT-50 could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| Isuzu D-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Mazda BT-50 is larger. Mazda BT-50 is 5 cm longer than the Isuzu D-Max, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda BT-50 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`030 | 2`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Isuzu D-Max has
| |