Mazda BT-50 2020 vs Nissan Navara 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda BT-50 is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan Navara can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda BT-50 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 | 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 163 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 425 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.2 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 8.0 | 6.4 - 7.0 | |
|
On average, Mazda BT-50 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 240 mm (9.4 inches) | 219 - 223 mm (8.6 - 8.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda BT-50 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.28 m | 5.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.83 m | |
| Mazda BT-50 is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda BT-50 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda BT-50 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Navara. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`067 kg | ~ 3`250 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`980 kg | ~ 2`100 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 1`087 kg | ~ 1`150 kg | |
| Mazda BT-50 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 6 procentiem less than Nissan Navara. Therefore, Nissan Navara is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda BT-50 has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |