Mazda BT-50 2020 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 | 2.3 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 150 - 181 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 380 - 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 8.0 | 7.6 - 8.6 | |
|
On average, Mazda BT-50 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 240 mm (9.4 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda BT-50 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.28 m | 5.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Mazda BT-50 is larger, but slightly lower. Mazda BT-50 and Mitsubishi L 200 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1061 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda BT-50 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200, which means Mazda BT-50 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`067 | ~ 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 30 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda BT-50 has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |