Mazda BT-50 2020 vs Ford Ranger 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 | 2.2 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 130 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 330 - 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.6 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 8.0 | 6.9 - 8.9 | |
|
On average, a Mazda BT-50 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Ford Ranger. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.28 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda BT-50 is 8 cm shorter than the Ford Ranger, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda BT-50 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`067 | ~ 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 31 800 | |