Mazda BT-50 2018 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.2 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 163 - 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 400 - 580 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.4 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 - 10.0 | 7.8 - 10.9 | |
|
On average, Mazda BT-50 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 232 mm (9.1 inches) | 192 mm (7.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda BT-50 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.37 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Mazda BT-50 is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda BT-50 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda BT-50 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Amarok, which means Mazda BT-50 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`200 kg | ~ 3`025 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`014 kg | ~ 2`090 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 1`186 kg | ~ 935 kg | |
| Mazda BT-50 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem more than Volkswagen Amarok. Therefore, Mazda BT-50 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 33 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda BT-50 has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |