Mazda BT-50 2018 vs Ford Ranger 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda BT-50 is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford Ranger can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda BT-50 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.2 | 2.0 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 170 - 213 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 420 - 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9 - 11.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 - 10.0 | 7.2 - 9.5 | |
|
On average, Mazda BT-50 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 232 mm (9.1 inches) | 237 - 283 mm (9.3 - 11.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.37 m | 5.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Mazda BT-50 is 1 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda BT-50 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda BT-50 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Mazda BT-50 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`200 kg | ~ 3`250 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`014 kg | ~ 2`255 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 1`186 kg | ~ 995 kg | |
| Mazda BT-50 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem more than Ford Ranger. Therefore, Mazda BT-50 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 25 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda BT-50 has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |