Mazda BT-50 2015 vs Toyota Hilux 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.2 | 2.4 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 200 HP | 150 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 375 - 470 NM | 400 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.8 - 13.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 - 9.2 | 7.0 - 8.0 | |
|
On average, Mazda BT-50 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 205 - 232 mm (8.1 - 9.1 inches) | 293 mm (11.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Hilux can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.37 m | 5.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda BT-50 is 4 cm longer than the Toyota Hilux, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 13.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda BT-50 is 1 metres less than that of the Toyota Hilux, which means Mazda BT-50 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`200 | ~ 3`095 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda BT-50 has
|
Toyota Hilux has
| |