Mazda BT-50 2015 vs Nissan Navara 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda BT-50 is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan Navara can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda BT-50 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.2 | 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 200 HP | 160 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 375 - 470 NM | 403 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.8 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 - 9.2 | 6.4 - 7.0 | |
|
On average, Mazda BT-50 equipped with diesel engines consume 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 205 - 232 mm (8.1 - 9.1 inches) | 600 mm (23.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Navara can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.37 m | 5.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda BT-50 is 7 cm longer than the Nissan Navara, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda BT-50 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`200 | ~ 3`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 19 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda BT-50 has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |