Mazda BT-50 2015 vs Nissan Navara 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.2 (diesel) | 2.5 - 4.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 200 HP | 174 - 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 375 - 470 NM | 385 - 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.4 - 11.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 - 9.2 | 8.5 - 13.8 | |
|
On average, Mazda BT-50 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.37 m | 5.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
| Mazda BT-50 is 15 cm longer than the Nissan Navara, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda BT-50 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 13.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda BT-50 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Nissan Navara, which means Mazda BT-50 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`200 | ~ 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda BT-50 has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |