Mazda BT-50 2015 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda BT-50 is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi L 200 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda BT-50 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.2 | 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 200 HP | 136 - 178 HP | |
| Torque: | 375 - 470 NM | 314 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.1 - 17.8 seconds | |
| In general, Mitsubishi L 200 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda BT-50. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 - 9.2 | 7.7 - 8.7 | |
|
On average, Mazda BT-50 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.37 m | 5.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Mazda BT-50 is larger. Mazda BT-50 is 22 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 8 cm wider, while the height of Mazda BT-50 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda BT-50 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200, which means Mazda BT-50 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`200 kg | ~ 2`875 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`047 kg | ~ 1`895 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 1`153 kg | ~ 980 kg | |
| Mazda BT-50 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem more than Mitsubishi L 200. Therefore, Mazda BT-50 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda BT-50 has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |