Mazda BT-50 2015 vs Mazda BT-50 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda BT-50 2015 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Mazda BT-50 2006 is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda BT-50 2015 is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda BT-50 2006 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mazda BT-50 2015 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.2 | 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 200 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 375 - 470 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 - 9.2 | 8.9 | |
|
On average, Mazda BT-50 2015 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda BT-50 2006. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 205 - 232 mm (8.1 - 9.1 inches) | 207 mm (8.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.37 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Mazda BT-50 2015 is larger. Mazda BT-50 2015 is 30 cm longer than the Mazda BT-50 2006, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda BT-50 2015 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda BT-50 2015 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda BT-50 2006. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`200 | ~ 3`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda BT-50 has
|
Mazda BT-50 has
| |