Mazda BT-50 2006 vs Toyota Yaris 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
| Mazda BT-50 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Toyota Yaris has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mazda BT-50 is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota Yaris can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 (diesel) | 1.0 - 1.8 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with diesel engines. Toyota Yaris is available also with petrol engines. Petrol engines typically offer smoother operation and quicker acceleration compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 69 - 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 93 - 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 9.3 - 16.9 seconds | |
| In general, Mazda BT-50 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Toyota Yaris. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 4.5 - 7.2 | |
|
On average, Mazda BT-50 equipped with diesel engines consume 4.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 3.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Mazda BT-50 is larger. Mazda BT-50 is 132 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, 11 cm wider, while the height of Mazda BT-50 is 23 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 275 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1183 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda BT-50 is 3.1 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Mazda BT-50 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`030 kg | ~ 1`477 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`780 kg | ~ 1`048 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 1`250 kg | ~ 429 kg | |
| Mazda BT-50 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 66 procentiem more than Toyota Yaris. Therefore, Mazda BT-50 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda BT-50 has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |