Mazda BT-50 2006 vs Toyota Hilux 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda BT-50 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Toyota Hilux has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 | 2.5 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 144 - 171 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 343 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12 - 13.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 7.3 - 8.6 | |
|
On average, Mazda BT-50 equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Mazda BT-50 is smaller. Mazda BT-50 is 19 cm shorter than the Toyota Hilux, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda BT-50 is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 900 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 13.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda BT-50 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Toyota Hilux, which means Mazda BT-50 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`030 | ~ 2`717 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda BT-50 has
|
Toyota Hilux has
| |