Mazda BT-50 2006 vs Nissan Navara 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 (diesel) | 2.4 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 133 - 148 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 208 - 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | no data | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
|
Mazda BT-50 is smaller. Mazda BT-50 is 15 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda BT-50 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 13.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda BT-50 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Nissan Navara, which means Mazda BT-50 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`030 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda BT-50 has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |