Mazda BT-50 2006 vs Infiniti QX56 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda BT-50 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Infiniti QX56 can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Infiniti QX56 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 | 5.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 313 - 325 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 529 - 533 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 7.2 - 7.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 14.5 - 15.3 | |
| Ground clearance: | 207 mm (8.1 inches) | 270 mm (10.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Infiniti QX56 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.97 m | |
|
Mazda BT-50 is smaller. Mazda BT-50 is 18 cm shorter than the Infiniti QX56, 20 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda BT-50 is 22 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1733 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda BT-50 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Infiniti QX56. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`030 | ~ 3`243 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Infiniti QX56 has
| |